by Bob Armbrister, on Nov 4, 2019 12:00:00 AM
Q: My fire alarm installer tells me that NFPA 72 does not require strobe synchronization of two (only two) devices. The sync is required if there are more than two. I read NFPA 72 2010 184.108.40.206 (4) and it is not clear if he is correct. Can you comment on it, please?
A: The installer is technically correct in that, since 1996, all manufacturers’ strobe flash rates were lowered so that viewing two non-synched devices would not produce an overall flash rate considered to be dangerous. As far as code requirements, the NFPA 72-2010 requirement for strobe synchronization is actually found in Chapter 220.127.116.11.2 (for rooms) and 18.104.22.168.5 & 7 (corridors). If this question is being asked for a room, then the intent is to achieve a minimum light output. If achieving that output requires ‘…more than 2 visual appliances…’, then they must be synched. In a corridor, “when more than 2 visible notification devices are in any field of view, they shall flash in synchronization.” So technically, if just two strobes are in the overall field of view (including non-direct viewing), they don’t need to be synched to meet NFPA 72 requirements.
That’s in a vacuum. However, in the real world, these devices are generally on circuits that have additional visual devices that serve other areas where more than two devices are in the direct or non-direct field of view, or the circuit may need be expanded in the future where synchronization is required. Another important real world consideration is the expectation of the facility’s reviewing AHJ (CMS, State Agency, Joint Commission, etc.). Unless the strobes were installed prior to 1999, the expectation of every AHJ I’ve dealt with since that time is that every strobe in line of sight will be synched. If in response to a citation, the chief engineer of a healthcare facility wants to pull out the code book and cite specific code application of strobe synchronization to their reviewer, he may eventually win that battle (or not), but in doing so he may be opening the door to a more ‘letter of the code’ enforcement regarding other areas of concern.
NOTE: Gene Rowe from Affiliated Fire Systems provided the answer to this question.